Legal Opinion

A.C.C. v. S.B.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2019No. ED 106357PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert M. Clayton Iii, Judge

S.B. ("Appellant"), acting pro se, appeals the judgment granting A.C.C. a full order of protection against Appellant. Because Appellant's brief so substantially fails to comply with the mandatory briefing requirements of Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.04 (2018)1 that it preserves nothing for our review, we dismiss the appeal.

I. DISCUSSION

Pro se appellants are held to the same standards as attorneys with respect to the mandatory appellate briefing requirements set forth in Rule 84.04. Hamilton v. Archer , 545 S.W.3d 377, 379, 379 n.1 (Mo. App. E.D. 2018) (similarly finding with respect to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. ArcherMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Davis v. LongMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dave Campbell and Catrenia Dawn Campbell v. Woodland Lakes Trusteeship, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. In the Estate of: William HanksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State of Missouri v. James S. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. State of Missouri v. Nore K. EdmondMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API