Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. United States

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided March 28, 2022No. 3:21-cv-03007Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION CHRISTOPHER LAMONT BRADSHAW, 3:21-CV-03007-RAL Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER DENYING VS. PETITIONER’S MOTION TO . RECONSIDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Christopher Lamont Bradshaw (“Bradshaw”) filed a motion under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

in this case to vacate, set aside or correct his criminal convictions for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance. He claims he received ineffective assistance from counsel at his jury trial. After Bradshaw failed to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. William F. Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corporation, and David C. TjosvoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  4. Watson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. Terrick Alfred Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API