Legal Opinion

Diiorio v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 17, 2022No. 2:20-cv-02330Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Sandra Diiorio, No. CV-20-02330-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Sandra Diiorio’s (“Plaintiff”) appeal of her 16 denial of social security disability benefits. Plaintiff argues that the Administrative Law 17 Judge (“ALJ”) erred in his residual functional capacity (“RFC”) determination by 18 mischaracterizing and “cherry-picking” evidence from the record, improperly disregarding 19 Plaintiff’s symptom…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Mary M. MAGALLANES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API