Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Allen v. Donath

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided April 13, 1994No. 10-93-237-CVPublished

1ConcurrenceVance, Justice

According to the Ohio Supreme Court in Thompson, “a player who injures another player in the course of a sporting event by conduct that is a foreseeable, customary part of the sport cannot be held liable for negligence because no duty is owed to protect the victim from that conduct.”1 I find this description of the scope of the reckless conduct standard to be more practical than the distinction between contact and non-contact sports. Although golf is not a contact sport in the same sense as football, ice hockey, or polo, a golfer obviously accepts the risk of *441coming in contact -with wayward…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Thompson v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Marchetti v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Nabozny v. BarnhillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Dale Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., and Charles "Booby" ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API