Legal Opinion

People v. Lee

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 7, 2001No. 3-00-0664PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdridge

The defendant, Christopher A. Lee, was convicted of first degree murder (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 38, par. 9 — 1(a)(1)). He filed a successive postconviction petition that was dismissed as frivolous. On appeal from the denial of his petition, the defendant argues that: (1) section 122 — 2.1 of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Act) (725 ILCS 5/122— 2.1 (West 2000)) is unconstitutional; and (2) his 80-year extended-term sentence violates the constitutional rule set forth in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). We hold that Apprendi applies…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. ReddickIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. RamirezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. People v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. People v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. People v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API