Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Henry

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 11, 1905PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Morgan Circuit Court. Heard before 1-Ion. 0. Kyle. Assumpsit by A. G-. Henry against the Frst National Bank of Decatur. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHaralson, J.

The undisputed facts are, that on the 2d of October, 1900, the plaintiff, A. G. Henry, deposited, with the defendant bank $12,000, taking a certificate of deposit as follows: “First National Bank of Decatur. $12,000.00. Decatur, Alabama, Oct. 2, 1900. A. G. Henry has deposited in this bank, twelve thousand •dollars payable to the order of himself, Dec. 15, 1900, on the return of this certificate properly endorsed. Interest, at 3 per cent, if left twelve months. W. W. Little-john, Cashier.”

The money that this certificate represented, was the money of and belonged to the plaintiff, and was not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. National Bank v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Harrison v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Manhattan Bank of Memphis v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert B. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  2. Bromberg v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. First Nat. Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Southeastern Const. Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Kenner v. City National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API