Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. ATF UC 3749
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided April 6, 2023No. 3:18-cv-00899Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ENEDEO RODRIGUEZ JR., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:18-CV-899 JD KYLE LERCH, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Enedeo Rodriguez is incarcerated and not represented by counsel. He filed an amended complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971), and
42 U.S.C. § 1983
against multiple defendants, claiming that they violated his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights when they investigated and searched his home and business for drug trafficking evidence. “A…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.