Legal Opinion

Kee v. State Highway Administration

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 10, 1986No. 559, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALPERT, Judge.

No precept of the common law was more imperviously etched in stone than the notion “that the king himself can do no wrong ...” 1 —the major premise of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Although the doctrine is no longer sacrosanct, it continues to give rise to knotty legal problems, one with which we are confronted in the case at bar. Here, we must review the Maryland Tort Claims Act, which waives sovereign immunity in certain actions to the extent the State is covered by liability insurance, and determine whether the State waived its immunity when it failed to purchase…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brewer v. MeleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  2. Austin v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Board of Trustees v. John K. Ruff, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. State v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  5. University of Maryland v. MaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kee v. State Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Crowell v. School District No. 7Montana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State Highway Administration v. KeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. In Re Train Collision at Gray, Ind.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Dillon v. Chicago South Shore & North Bend Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API