James E. Mitchell Co. v. Hartsell Mills Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
This appeal presents a somewhat voluminous record. To review it in its entirety in this opinion would serve no useful purpose so far as the decision of the legal controversies submitted to us are concerned. They, and the facts giving rise to them, have been passed upon by a very able referee whose report has been confirmed by the court below. A painstaking consideration of everything in the case and a careful study of the brief of appellant’s counsel, with the earnest oral argument made by him in mind, has not convinced us that the determination reached is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Sistare v. . BestNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Searing v. ButlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Zimmermann v. WeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Braunn & Fitts v. Keally, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.