Falk v. Curtis Pub. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Ou Demurrer to ’Plaintiff’s Statement of Claim.
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
The defendant has assigned 10 reasons in support of its demurrer to tlie plaintiff’s statement of claim:
1. The objection that “the writ and statement are defective and insufficient, in not alleging that the suit is brought as well for himself as for the United States,” need not be considered; for the plaintiff’s counsel, though denying that such a suit must be so brought, concede that it may be, and have expressed their willingness to amend by adding after the name of the plaintiff these words, “who sues as well for himself as for the United States”; and this amendment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. SaronySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Stewart v. Waterloo Turn VereinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Taft v. Stephens Lith. & Eng. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1889
- Ferrett v. AtwillU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1846
- Androscoggin Water Power Co. v. Bethel Steam Mill Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Falk v. Curtis Pub. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1900