Falk v. Curtis Pub. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
This is an action to recover a forfeiture for the alleged infringement of a copyrighted photograph..
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
The demurrer to the plaintiff’s original statement did not challenge the jurisdiction of this court. Upon the argument of that demurrer it was incidentally denied; hut, as the learned counsel of the defendant then stated that he purposed to raise the question more formally thereafter, it Avas not fully discussed, and its consideration was deferred. 98 Fed. 989. The case has since been heard upon a demurrer to the amended statement, by which it is, among other things, averred that “the pleading does not recite any cause of action or subject-matter cognizable by this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. SaronySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Lees v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. MooneySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Howell v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Bolles v. Outing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.