Legal Opinion

Haardt v. Farmer's Mutual Fire Insurance

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 7, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-272PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROTMAN, District Judge:

This action arises out of several property insurance policies issued by the Farmer’s Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Salem County (“Defendant Insurance Company”) to the plaintiffs Fred and Virginia Haardt. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Presently before the court is the motion of the Defendant Insurance Company for summary judgment.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In their complaint filed January 19, 1991, 1 Fred and Virginia Haardt seek to recover on insurance policies issued by the Defendant Insurance Company for losses allegedly…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hager v. GonsalvesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  2. Ali, Inc. v. GeneraliDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  3. Gahnney v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  4. ARZADI v. EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  5. GEA MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT U.S., INC. v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API