State v. Johnson

I concur with the result reached by the majority, but write separately to express my concern about the standards of determining the admissibility of “reverse Spreigl ”1 evidence.

Although I agree that the foundational requirements for admissibility of reverse Spreigl evidence are identical to those foundational requirements for admissibility of Spreigl evidence, I disagree with the conclusion reached by both the majority and the dissent that the analyses within each foundational requirement for admissibility of reverse Spreigl evidence are the same as the analyses within each foundational…