Legal Opinion

Yazoo & Miss. V. R. R. v. James

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the chancery court of Tallahatchie county. Hon. Joe May, Special Chancellor. Suit by the Yazoo & M. Y. B. Company against T. Gr. James and others. From an interlocutory decree, plaintiff appeals. Heard on motion to dismiss appeal and to discharge the supersedeas. ■ The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the «court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant filed its hill in the court below alleging that appellees had each instituted separate suits at law .against it; that J. H. Lay and numerous parties, whose names are not given, were threatening so to do, and •praying that the suits instituted and the one threatened by Lay be enjoined, and that all of the controversies therein sought to be litigated be adjudicated by decree of the court below; the- ground upon which this relief is sought being that thereby a multiplicity of suits will be prevented. A preliminary injunction having been granted in response to the prayer of this bill, a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HutchinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Ward v. WhitfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Bierce v. GrantMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Buckley v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Kimball, Raymond & Co. v. Alcorn & FisherMississippi Supreme Court · 1871

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WoodruffMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Carothers v. Bank of BaldwynMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Slater v. BishopMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Federal Land Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  5. MacHesky v. BizzellDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API