Buckley v. George
Mississippi Supreme Court
From the circuit court of Clarke county. Hon. S. H. Terral, Judge. The opinion states the case. As soon as bond was given and the writ of supersedeas issued, appellant was entitled to the property. The receivers no longer had the right to retain possession ; the decree appointing them was then vacated.
Read the full summary
From the circuit court of Clarke county. Hon. S. H. Terral, Judge. The opinion states the case. As soon as bond was given and the writ of supersedeas issued, appellant was entitled to the property. The receivers no longer had the right to retain possession ; the decree appointing them was then vacated. Bisbee v. Hall, 3 Ohio, 449; JSldridge v. Chambers, 8 B. Monroe (Ky.), 411. Regardless of appellant’s rights, the defendants held possession of her property after the supersedeas was issued, and therefore became trespassers, and liable in damages. In addition to the above authorities, we cite…
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
This is an action at law by appellant to recover from appellees damages for injuries sustained by her under the following circumstances: On the eighteenth day of January, A.D. 1892, Putnam, Baldwin & Co. and others, exhibited their bill against the appellant and others, and by an order of the chancellor then made in vacation in said cause, the appellees were appointed receivers of the appellant’s estate, consisting of a stock of goods of the value of $6,000, of notes, book accounts and other rights in action of the value of $20,000, and of her lands located in Clarke, Jasper and other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blondheim v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
- Everett v. State ex rel. McKaigCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Parker v. DeanMississippi Supreme Court · 1871
- Hill v. RobertsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. St. Louis & Kirkwood Railroad v. HirzelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Forrester & MacGinniss v. Boston & Montana Consol. Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1899
- Tornanses v. MelsingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Farmers National Bank v. BackusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.