Legal Opinion
United States v. Ehrlichman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 24, 1974No. Crim. 74-116PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GESELL, District Judge.
Five defendants stand indicted for conspiring to injure a Los Angeles psychiatrist in the enjoyment of his Fourth Amendment rights by entering his offices without a warrant for the purpose of obtaining the doctor’s medical records relating to one of his patients, a Daniel Ellsberg, then under Federal indictment for revealing top secret documents. They now claim that broad pretrial discovery into the alleged national security aspects of this case is essential to the presentation of their defense, in that it will establish (1) that the break-in was…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. John D. EhrlichmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Bernard L. Barker, United States of America v. Eugenio R. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.