Legal Opinion
United States v. Bernard L. Barker, United States of America v. Eugenio R. Martinez
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 17, 1976No. 74-1883, 74-1884PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion Per Curiam.
Circuit Judge WILKEY and District Judge MERHIGE filed opinions reversing the judgment of the District Court. Dissenting Opinion filed by Circuit Judge LEVENTHAL. PER CURIAM:
The mandate of the court is that the Judgment of the District Court is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial. Judges Wilkey and Merhige have filed separate opinions. Judge Leventhal dissents.
WILKEY, Circuit Judge:
Two of the “footsoldiers” of the Watergate affair, Bernard Barker and Eugenio Martinéz, are with us again. They haven’t been promoted, they are still footsoldiers. They come before…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- James W. McCord Jr. v. F. Lee BaileyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.