Legal Opinion
SVERDRUP TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 23, 2009No. 1071113PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Application for Rehearing
LYONS, Justice.
On August 14, 2009, this Court affirmed, without an opinion, a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding compensatory damages to Ronnie Robinson d/b/a ADR Technical Services (“Robinson”) 1 in the amount of $78,000 on Robinson’s claim of intentional misrepresentation against Sverdrup Technology, Inc. (“Sverdrup”). In the brief supporting its application for a rehearing, Sverdrup urges this Court to “provide a thoughtful opinion that addresses the serious issues” raised on appeal and in the application. We withdraw our no-opinion affirmance and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ex Parte Excelsior Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Ex parte Edgetech I.G., Inc. n/k/a Quanex I.G. Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Garrison Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. No. 1 Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- Branded Trailer Sales, Inc. v. Universal Truckload Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- Ex Parte DragomirSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.