Legal Opinion
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Atwood
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided April 22, 2003No. 2:00-cv-00108PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALAN B. JOHNSON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and the defendant’s opposition to the motion came before the Court for consideration. A hearing was held April 11, 2003 at which counsel for the parties appeared and presented their respective arguments. The Court, having considered the parties’ written submissions, the pleadings of record, the applicable law, their arguments at the hearing, and being fully advised, FINDS that the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment should be GRANTED, for the reasons stated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. City of Superior, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- The Kansas City Southern Railway Co., Cross v. Shirley McNamara Secretary of the Dept. Of Revenue and Taxation, State of Louisiana, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Ogilvie v. STATE BD. OF EQUALIZATION, ETC.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1980
- Trailer Train Co., Railgon Co., Railbox Co. v. State Tax Commission, Director of Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Trailer Train Company Railbox Company and Railgon Company v. Donald S. Leuenberger, Tax Commissioner of the State of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Alabama Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008