Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Lombardozzi

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1972Published

1Dissent

Jasen, J. (dissenting).

The question presented on this appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient for the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant’s coneededly false testimony, relating to material matter, was given “ wilfully and knowingly”. (Former Penal Law, § 1620.)

The law is well settled that the falsity of one’s testimony does not alone establish that it was given “ wilfully and knowingly ”. (People v. Samuels, 284 N. Y. 410, 415; People v. Hattemer, 4 AD 2d 775, affd. 4N Y2d 835; see, also, Perkins, Criminal Law [1957 ed.], pp. 389-390; A.L.I. Model Penal Code T. D.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. Martin SweigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. People v. . DoodyNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. People Ex Rel. Hegeman v. . CorriganNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. United States v. George Sam MaginCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API