Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Petition of University Hospitals Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1998No. 90212Published

1Concurring in the judgmentOp Ala, Justice

Although I concur in today’s judgment, I write separately to explain the critical steps that guide my analysis of this case.(1) Judicial scrutiny of the Transaction at hand is confined by law to a search for infirmities recognized in the legal system. The range of policy choices and of considerations that would accommodate, or even command, managerial or economic preferences (éither of short- or of long-term character) may not enter into the court’s decisional *322process. These concerns lie exclusively within the domain of executive or legislative action.1(2) The activities that by the terms of…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. York v. TurpenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API