Legal Opinion

In re: M.C.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 1, 2020No. 1273/19PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In re: M.C., No. 1273, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Nazarian, J., filed April 1, 2020. APPEAL AND REVIEW – MOOTNESS – EVASION OF REVIEW Exception to mootness doctrine is available in cases that present a recurring matter of public concern, which, unless decided, would continue to evade review, and applied to juvenile court orders that are almost always replaced by subsequent orders and, absent review, would negate a parent’s ability to challenge them. CHILDREN IN NEED OF ASSISTANCE – MODIFICATION OF VISITATION – HEARING Juvenile Court abused its discretion and violated mother’s due…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Yve S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Hayman v. St. Martin's Evangelical Lutheran ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Office of the Public Defender v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Taylor v. MandelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. La Valle v. La ValleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Belton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  2. In re: K.B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API