Legal Opinion

Wininger v. Ameristar Casino, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided April 20, 1999No. 98-CA-00764-COAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, P. J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Linda K. Wininger appeals the Circuit Court of Warren County’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the appellee. Wininger argues that the circuit court erred (1) in prematurely granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment, (2) in concluding that the Amer-istar Casino was not a “vessel” under the Jones Act, and (3) in concluding that Ms. Wininger was not a “seaman” for

purposes of the Jones Act. From the circuit court’s grant of defendant’s motion for summary judgment, Wininger assigns the following issues for review:

I. DID THE TRIAL COURT…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Brown v. Credit Center, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Harbor Tug & Barge Co. v. PapaiSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Southwest Marine, Inc. v. GizoniSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. BerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rush v. Casino Magic Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Little v. ClodfelterCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2001
  3. Trout v. BucherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Rhonda Rush v. Casino Magic CorporationMississippi Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API