Legal Opinion

Kies v. City of Aurora

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 16, 2001No. 00 C 2677PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALESIA, District Judge.

Currently before the court are: (1) plaintiffs motion in limine, (2) defendants’ motions in limine, (3) defendant Officer Smith’s motion for partial summary judgment, and (4) defendant City of Aurora’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the court (1) grants in part and denies in part plaintiffs motion in limine, (2) grants defendants’ motions in limine, (3) grants in part and denies in part Officer Smith’s motion for partial summary judgment, and (4) grants in part and denies in part City of Aurora’s motion for…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Liser v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  3. People v. KotlinskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Larsen v. Fort Wayne Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  5. Powell v. City of BerwynDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API