Legal Opinion
Poddar v. Department of Revenue
Oregon Tax Court
Decided September 1, 2005No. TC 4689PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY C. BREITHAUPT, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court for decision after trial. Bhagwati P. Poddar (taxpayer) appeared pro se. Intervenor Clatsop County Assessor (the county) was represented by counsel. Defendant Department of Revenue (the department) tendered its defense to the county and did not participate at trial.
II. FACTS
Taxpayer and his spouse purchased a property in Clatsop County in 1974. That property initially consisted of a residence (the old house) and a number of other structures located on 9.5 acres. In 1993, the county split the original piece of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woods v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2002
- Tualatin Development Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Bayridge Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1994
- King v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1993
3Cited by92 opinions
- Freitag v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2006
- Freitag v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court · 2006
- Poddar v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Banducci v. Douglas County Assessor, Tc-Md 090069c (or.tax 9-23-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010
- Berrey v. Lane County Assessor, Tc-Md 110191d (or.tax 12-14-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.