Legal Opinion

In re Deitch

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 2014No. 13-10121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEPHEN RASLAVICH, Bankruptcy Judge.

Introduction

The Debtor has objected to the Proof of Claim of Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae). The Objection is opposed. A hearing on the matter was held on September 17, 2014. After the conclusion of the hearing and the submission of post-trial briefs, the Court took the matter under advisement. For the reasons which follow, the Objection will be denied.1

Proof of Claim And Objection

Fannie Mae’s Proof of Claim is based on a consumer loan secured by a mortgage. The Debtor has objected to it claiming that he made a valid request to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deitch v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (In re Deitch)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API