Center of Deposit, Inc. v. Village of Deposit
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtStein, J.
*1451Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to overturn the positive declaration of environmental significance and approve its subdivision application. Supreme Court dismissed the petition on the basis that it was not ripe for review and, in any event, that the Board’s determination was not arbitrary and capricious. Petitioner now appeals.
Initially, we find that the dispute is ripe for review. A determination is final, and therefore ripe for review, when it “impose [s] an obligation, den[ies] a right or fix[es] some legal relationship as a consummation of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Akpan v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Essex County v. ZagataNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- WEOK Broadcasting Corp. v. Planning BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gordon v. RushNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- City Council of Watervliet v. Town Board of ColonieNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ranco Sand & Stone Corp. v. VecchioNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Village of Chestnut Ridge v. Town of RamapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Ranco Sand & Stone Corp. v. VecchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Center of Deposit, Inc. v. Village of DepositAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Center of Deposit, Inc. v. Village of DepositAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.