Legal Opinion

Renwick v. Hay

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 6, 1919PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On motion to strike out bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, V. C.

The bill prays for a determination of the rights of the parties in certain private ways or roads. It is impossible to comprehend the exact situation without reference to a sketch annexed to this opinion, viz.:

By deed dated October 22d, 1881, George TV". Allen, who was at the time the owner of all of the property marked on the sketch as plots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, conveyed to John P. Allen the property marked plot 1. The deed contained the following provision:

“The above described premises are conveyed expressly subject to a perpetual right of way over so much of the same as is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sharon v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Palmer v. PalmerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ohio Oil Co. v. Wyoming AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Lidgerwood Estates v. Public Service, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  4. Chesney v. Valley Live Stock Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Bragg v. MarionWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API