Legal Opinion

Chemical Financial Services Corp. v. Zagaro

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin G. Karopkin, J.

The defendants request an order dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint for improper service and on the ground that the plaintiff’s action is barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations.

The plaintiff, Chemical Financial Services Corp. (Chemical), commenced this action to recover the balance due on a promissory note and retail installment contract and security agreement executed by the defendants on or about June 2, 1987. The defendants had borrowed the sum of $24,000 and had agreed to repay the loan over a period of 120 months (10 years) in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Lew Morris Demolition Co. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Becker v. Huss Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Duell v. CondonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Skaneateles Savings Bank v. Modi AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Fleet Bank, N. A. v. RieseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Mathieu v. BraxtonNew York Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API