Legal Opinion

Davis v. Bennett

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided September 5, 1953No. 8135PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, Chief Judge.

The defendant has filed a motion for a summary judgment on the sole ground that the claim alleged by the plaintiff in his complaint is one arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Laws of Missouri, V. A.M.S. § 287.010 et seq., and that, perforce such laws, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover in this common-law action. The action is for an alleged assault and battery. Clearly such an action exists at common law so that the only question is, whether, upon the facts presented in defendant’s motion, the injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff were inflicted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. General Accident, Fire & Life Assur. Corp. v. CrowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  2. Ætna Life Ins. v. WindhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fautheree v. Insulation & Specialties, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Devlin Ex Rel. Devlin v. EnnisIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Devlin Ex Rel. Devlin v. EnnisIdaho Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API