State v. Burrow
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Winkler, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Anthony Burrow was indicted for carrying a concealed weapon and having a weapon under disability. Following a jury trial, Burrow was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon but acquitted of the weapon-under-disability charge. Burrow appeals, assigning the following as error: (1) the admission of evidence of his outstanding warrant; (2) his fourteen-month sentence where the verdict form failed to specify a felony-enhancement element; (3) the state’s closing argument; (4) ineffective assistance of counsel; and (5) the reading to the jury of a portion of a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WoullardOhio Court of Appeals · 2004