Legal Opinion

State v. Burrow

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 2000No. Trial No. B-9907240, Appeal No. C-000043PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Winkler, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Anthony Burrow was indicted for carrying a concealed weapon and having a weapon under disability. Following a jury trial, Burrow was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon but acquitted of the weapon-under-disability charge. Burrow appeals, assigning the following as error: (1) the admission of evidence of his outstanding warrant; (2) his fourteen-month sentence where the verdict form failed to specify a felony-enhancement element; (3) the state’s closing argument; (4) ineffective assistance of counsel; and (5) the reading to the jury of a portion of a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WoullardOhio Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API