Legal Opinion

Benat v. Dallas County

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1924No. 9165PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLooney, J.

This cáse is before the court on appeal from the judgment of the court below sustaining a general demurrer urged by appellee^ to appellant’s petition, and in dismissing the cause.

Appellant’s cause of action, as alleged, is substantially that he has owned, since December, 1921, certain lots in block 34 of Trinity Heights addition No. 3, which became a part of the city of Dallas in the month of April, 1923. He shows that his home and place of business are established and maintained on this property, and .that about April, 1923, appellees, without previous notice to him, attempted to remove…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haverbekken v. Hale, County JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  3. G. C. S. F. Ry. Co. v. F. W. R. G. Ry. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Norwood v. Gonzales CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Ellis v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Austin Independent School District v. Sierra ClubTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Texas Turnpike Authority v. ShepperdTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Gulf Coast Irrigation Co. v. GaryTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Gabbert v. City of BrownwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Lone Star Gas Co. v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1936

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API