Pamplemoussier, L.L.C. v. Poche
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentTheriot, J.
hThe majority relies on the tax deed being prima facie evidence of the validity of the tax adjudication proceedings. The burden is placed upon the Poches’ to prove the irregularity of the tax adjudication proceedings. The Poches’ do not challenge any action prior to the tax sale nor do they challenge the tax sale itself. The Poches’ argue Pamplemoussier violated R.S. 47:2183(C)1 and therefore the tax sale should be nullified. The alleged irregularity is the failure of the purchaser to comply with R.S.'47:2183(0). The Poches’ successfully plead in their amended answer that the tax sale should…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Lewis v. Succession of JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.