Legal Opinion

McDaniels v. Miller

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1961No. 5385Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing

2Per curiam

In application for rehearing, counsel for plaintiffs-appellants for the first time suggest that the present matter is a possessory action coupled with a prayer for damages and that the trial court (as well as this court on appeal) erred in otherwise considering appellants’ demands. Additionally, learned counsel urges that defendant was without right to herein demand the fixing of a boundary between the estates of the parties by way of reconventional demand for the reason that, in a possessory action, title or boundary is of no moment — the sole issue being limited…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. Baldwin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Brumfield v. CryerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Ebarbo v. StaceyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Haas v. CurrieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  5. Bryson v. GeorgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API