Legal Opinion
Zenobia Co. v. American Pistachio Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChurch, J.
The plaintiff corporation has brought this action for an injunction to restrain alleged unfair and unlawful competition on the part of the various defendants, for an accounting and for damages.
The plaintiff, a domestic corporation, was organized in January, 1926, to engage in the business of dealing in pistachio and other kinds of nuts.
The defendants do not dispute the claim of the plaintiff that prior to 1921 Salim F. Zaloom, at present an officer and director of the plaintiff corporation, had been experimenting with improved methods of salting and coating unshelled pistachio nuts. Nor is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kaumagraph Co. v. . Stampagraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Neva-Wet Corp. of America, Inc. v. Never Wet Processing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- New Era Electric Range Co. v. SerrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Zenie v. MiskendNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Zenie v. MiskendAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
3Cited by4 opinions
- Giguere v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Quinby & Co. v. FunstonNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Zenobia Co. v. American Pistachio Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Hirschfield v. York Board of Realtors, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1972