Legal Opinion
United States v. Joe Dean Swift (86-1079), James C. Hettmansperger (86-1083)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1987No. 86-1079, 86-1083PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Joe Swift and James Hettmansperger challenge their convictions arising from a drug conspiracy and tax evasion jury trial. Joe Swift was convicted of conspiring to distribute marihuana, of possession of marihuana with the intent to distribute and of interstate travel in aid of racketeering. James Hettmansperger was convicted of conspiring to distribute marihuana and of false declarations to a grand jury. Hettmansperger argues that the district court abused its discretion in joining him in the indictment against the other defendants, and both Hettmansperger…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cox v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Robert G. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Joseph C. Gallo Frederick Graewe Hartmut Graewe, Kevin Joseph McTaggart Angelo A. LonardoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Cecil RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- United States v. Roy C. Blakeney (90-5664), Kenneth A. Kutnyak (90-5665), and James E. Box (90-6041)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Isidro Moreno (90-5832), Paul R. Morris (90-5867)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. David A. Sturman (90-3147) Ralph L. Levine (90-3148) Reuben Sturman (90-3151) and Melvin Kaminsky (90-3750)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.