Legal Opinion
Borner v. Autry
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 2009No. W2007-00731-SC-R11-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HolderJanice M. Holder, C.J.
in which CORNELIA A. CLARK, GARY R. WADE, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined.
This case involves the interpretation and application of Tennessee Code Annotated section 24-5-113(a), which provides a re-buttable presumption that medical bills itemized in and attached to the complaint are necessary and reasonable if the “total amount of such bills” does not exceed $4,000. We hold that a plaintiff may rely on section 24-5-113(a) if the total amount of the medical bills that are itemized and attached does not exceed $4,000, regardless of the total amount of medical'…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Eastman Chemical Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- In re C.K.G.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Lavin v. JordonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Parks v. Tennessee Municipal League Risk Management PoolTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by24 opinions
- Fayne v. VincentTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Aundrey MEALS Ex Rel. William MEALS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANYTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Jean Dedmon v. Debbie SteelmanTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- Regions Bank v. Thomas D. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- Fred v. Wilson v. Monroe County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.