Legal Opinion

Young v. Missouri, O. G. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 19, 1915No. 3855PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error frorh Superior Court, Muskogee County; Action by W. J. Young against the Missouri, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

The brief of plaintiff in error complains of the admission and rejection of testimony. Rule 25 (38 Okla. x, 137 Pac. xi) of this court requires that, where a party complains on account of the admission or rejection of testimony, he shall set out in his brief the full substance of the testimony to the admission or rejection of which he objects, stating specifically his objection thereto. This he has failed to do, and the assignment will therefore not be considered. Scoville et al. v. Powell et al., 33 Okla. 446, 126 Pac. 730.

Plaintiff in error assigns as error the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Finch v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Straughan v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Shuler v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Scoville Et Ux. v. PowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sand Springs Railway Co. v. WesthaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Commercial Investment Trust v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Mitchelson v. Commercial Investment TrustSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Fullerton-Stuart Lumber Co. v. BadgerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Long v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API