Winston Corporation v. Park Electric Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Judge.
"[J]udges are always presumed to know judicially what the law is,” said this court in Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp., 81 Ga. App. 324 (1) (58 SE2d 559). To this aphorism former Chief Judge Felton appropriately appended a key word "theoretically” in Sparks Specialty Co. v. Moss, 110 Ga. App. 585, 586 (139 SE2d 345).1 Proceeding on this presumption counsel for both parties in this appeal have lightened our labors by eschewing spurious scholarship in refraining from citing numerous legal authorities. In fact appellant’s brief wisely contained no citations because it was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- L. M. Wiley, Parish & Co. v. KelseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Winston Corp. v. Park Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- SPARKS SPECIALITY CO. v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
3Cited by10 opinions
- McDANIEL PRINTING COMPANY, INC. v. BEN MEADOWS COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Hitchcock v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- McBride v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- In re R. L. Y.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.