Legal Opinion

SPARKS SPECIALITY CO. v. Moss

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 3, 1964No. 40979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

It was not necessary for the plaintiff to cite authority for the propounding of the interrogatories in the instrument propounding them any more than it is necessary to expressly base any pleading, within the pleading itself, upon whatever statute or Code section or other law which authorizes it. The courts are presumed to know the law, theoretically, and generally speaking it is unnecessary to allege matters of local law. Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp., 81 Ga. App. 324 (1) (58 SE2d 559); 41 Am. Jur. 294, Pleading, § 11. Nor would the fact that the plaintiff incorrectly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. Tomlinson v. SadlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McBride v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Winston Corporation v. Park Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Bradley v. Coach & Six Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Ward v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Winston Corporation v. Park Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API