Legal Opinion

People v. Castro

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided July 17, 2012No. BR049674PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*Supp. 13Opinion

RICCIARDULLI, J.

Appellant and defendant Antonio Castro pled no contest to petty theft and vandalism after his Penal Code section 991 motion regarding the sufficiency of the evidence was denied. On appeal, defendant argues that his conviction should be reversed due to the trial court’s denial of his Penal Code section 991 motion. We affirm the conviction and hold that defendant is not entitled to relief because he pled no contest following the denial of his motion.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Defendant was charged by a complaint with petty theft and vandalism. (Pen. Code,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. LaudermilkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. HoffardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. AlwienCalifornia Superior Court · 2017
  2. People v. AlwienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API