Legal Opinion

Halpin v. Barringer

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1874No. 3706PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Eighth District Court, parish of Orleans. Dibble, J.

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss.

Howe, J.

A motion to dismiss has been made, on the ground that the appellant, a garnishee, can not appeal. The right of a garnishee to appeal, for his own protection, has often been recognized by this ■court. 10 M. 568; 13 La. 570; 14 La. 511; 18 La. 405; Semeritt v. McNamara, Opinion Book, No. 37, p. 557; State ex rel. Tureaud v. *171Parish Judge, 23 An. 717. We are not prepared to say that in this case an appeal does not lie under the rule as first laid down in the case in 10 Martin. The case differs from Roehereau v. Guidry, this day decided. Motion overruled. /

On the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kimball v. PlantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  2. Lee & Hardy v. PalmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  2. Commonwealth v. RovnianekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Johnson v. BoltLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Daniel v. Department of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API