Johnson v. Bolt
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDrew, J.
This case is before us on a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the appeal is alleged to be from an interlocutory decree, for the further reason that the appeal was taken from a judgment confessed by appellee, and, further, that appellant, the garnishee, is a mere stakeholder and without interest to set up any defense for the real debtor, Mrs. Mary C. Bolt.
The record discloses that E. B. Herndon was made garnishee under a writ of fieri facias based upon a judgment in favor of Bryan E. Bush, assignee, against Mrs-Mary Q. Bolt. The following interrogatories were propounded to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Daigle v. BirdSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870
- Halpin v. BarringerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874
- Oakey v. Mississippi & Alabama RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1839
- Bolt v. Succession of BoltLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. BoltLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- United States v. Allen Brothers of Homer, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1984
- Ascension Credit Union v. BabinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Daniel v. Department of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981