Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Eiler

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 2010No. 200,701-5Published

1ConcurrenceSanders, J.

¶29 (concurring) — Four justices endorse suspending the Honorable Judith Raub Eiler without pay for five days. Four justices find suspension without pay for 90 days appropriate. Both choices leave much to be desired, but I believe suspension for five days without pay presents the lesser of two evils we could loose upon Judge Eiler. I endorse such a result only to avert the dissent’s undeservedly harsh sanction. Accordingly I agree with the lead opinion in result only, and I write separately to explain why I believe reprimand presents the appropriate sanction.

*359ANALYSIS

¶30 I agree with the lead…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re the Personal Restraint of MontoyaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Dodds v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against TurcoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API