Legal Opinion
Lea v. Lea
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 16, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
28 N.J. Super. 290 (1953)
100 A.2d 545
NAOMI RUTH LEA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROBERT M. LEA, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided November 16, 1953.
Mr. Morton C. Steinberg, attorney for plaintiff.
Mr. Thomas D. Begley, attorney for defendant.
MCLEAN, J.S.C.
This is an action seeking to recover alleged arrears of alimony based on a judgment for divorce and alimony obtained in the Supreme Court of New York, and directly attacking the decree of divorce obtained by the defendant in the Ashley County Chancery Court of Arkansas.
The parties were married November 5, 1925, in the State of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Kurilla Ex Rel. Kurilla v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- Continental National Bank of Boston v. ThurberNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Cromwell v. NeeldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lipman v. Rutgers-State Univ. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000