Legal Opinion
State v. Hamilton
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 17, 1988No. 10070PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
On rehearing, the previous opinion is withdrawn and the following is substituted.
Defendant, convicted after a jury trial of two counts of resisting, evading or obstructing an officer contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-22-1 (Repl.Pamp.1984), appeals Count I of his convictions. Defendant contends this conviction is in violation of the double jeopardy clause of the federal and state constitutions. Defendant has not appealed his conviction under Count II of the criminal information. We affirm.
This is the second time defendant’s case has come before us. Following…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. Dominick Sabella and Charles LacasciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. CorradoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- State v. RomanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. YoungNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. LeybaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. JimenezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.