Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Finlay

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1992No. 01-90-00088-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

O’CONNOR, Justice.

We grant the appellee’s motion for rehearing and after hearing argument, we withdraw our earlier opinion and issue this opinion in its stead.

The issue before us is: May a trial court make an oral order at a rule 1661 pretrial conference, which is not reduced to writing and not recorded in a statement of facts, and later dismiss a party’s suit with prejudice for the violation of that order? This appeal arises because an oral order made during a rule 166 pretrial conference was not reduced to writing, was not recorded in a statement of facts, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reese v. PiperiTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Walker v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. McCormack v. GuillotTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Tate v. Commodore County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  5. Manoogian v. Lake Forest Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Javier Palacios, Individually and D/B/A Palacios Motors v. Andy Winters D/B/A Houston Automotive Group, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  2. Pedro Echartea v. Juan D. Flores and Martha O. Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2024
  3. in Re Steven Baileys, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API