Legal Opinion

Dargan v. RICHARDSON

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 26, 1956No. 17135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, Justice.

The question in this appeal is whether or not persons who pay for the privilege may fish in private ponds of this State with artificial fishing tackle without complying with the provisions of Sections 28-551 and 28-554 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina 1952, relating to the procurement of fishing licenses by such persons.

Plaintiff is the owner of certain lands in Horry County whereupon she has excavated and created certain fish ponds which are supplied by water both from natural sources and through pumping from the intracoastal waterway in such a way that they are entirely…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  2. Territory v. Hoy ChongHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Commonwealth v. GilbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Vickers v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. State v. HeardMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Ohio Water Service Co. v. ResslerOhio Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. HeardMississippi Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API