Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Andernovics

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 10, 2000No. 3-99-0223PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin

Plaintiff Peggy Parrish filed suit against the estate of Budris Andernovics, claiming Andernovics breached an oral contract to make a will. The trial court denied Parrish’s claim and ordered her to pay the estate’s attorney fees as a sanction for her failure to comply with a discovery order. Parrish now appeals, arguing that she should have been granted judgment on the pleadings because the estate neither admitted nor denied the allegations of her complaint. For the reasons that follow, we affirm and hold that a probate court may require a claimant to prove her claim when the estate files an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kubian v. LabinskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Hartnett v. StackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Lavaja v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Greenwood v. Commercial Nat. Bank of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Beiermann v. EdwardsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of AndernovicsIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Fritz v. FerryAppellate Court of Illinois · 2025
  3. Zemater v. Village of WatermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  4. Zemater v. Village of WatermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  5. In re Estate of AndernovicsIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API