Legal Opinion

Dinger v. McCoy Transportation Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

We shall deal only with the question of apportionment of negligence. The matter can be more accurately presented in connection with plaintiff’s Exhibit 1, reproduced herewith. The letter X is the point where the driver of the bus testified he entered the intersection traveling at a speed of twenty-five miles per hour. The letter T is the point where he testified the collision took place, and he further testified that the bus traveled about twenty-eight feet beyond point T after the collision. Point Y is where the plaintiff testified he started to make his left turn. The letter K represents…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grasser v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hansen v. StorandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Lardeau v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Lurie v. NickelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Barkdoll v. WinkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quady v. SicklWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Dickman v. SchaefferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  4. Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  5. Quady v. SicklWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API